Flock cameras

Raised concerns that camera placement and timing could make incidents look worse than they are.

Called the police presentation untrue, citing alleged unjustified searches in Indiana and data-selling claims, and said she doesn't consent to the searches.

Cited Supreme Court cell-phone privacy cases and a pending Fourth Amendment appeal, asked the city to retain Flock audit logs for FOIA, and referenced a Sheboygan data-selling controversy.

Urged the commission to end the Flock contract, calling it a Fourth Amendment violation and Big Brother surveillance at $39,000 a year.

Linked Flock's investors to Palantir and warned of an Orwellian surveillance state.

Mentioned spray products that defeat Flock cameras, and asked why past cost savings from automation and outsourcing never reached residents.

Asked the city not to renew the Flock contract, calling the vendor's crime stats a sales pitch and citing misreads and data risks.

Wants Flock banned outright, or at minimum warrants, strict limits, and transparency reports for every search.

Said the 31 opposing speakers were told 'heck with you,' criticized Flock cameras, and questioned the $490,000 block grant to New Level Sports.

Reported a year-old unrepaired sidewalk on Goodale, a city maple that fell on a neighbor's house and cars, objected to the Flock surveillance system on Fourth Amendment grounds, and complained about pothole damage to his car.